In the last 15 years, fighting in hockey, has turned into a controversial debate topic not only in the world of hockey, but in our everyday lives. People argue whether or not fighting should be allowed in hockey. This debate started after retired NHL players who were “enforcers”, started developing CTE-like symptoms. Enforcers are players who fight for their team, to protect the star and smaller players on the team.
I’ve been playing hockey for the past 10 years, since I was 7 years old, and the debate whether or not fighting should be allowed in hockey. In the early stages of my career, there was very little physical contact between players. Therefore, I never understood why there was fighting at the professional levels. However, as I grew up, physical contact between players started and I slowly understood why fighting is allowed. As of right now, I believe that fighting should be allowed despite the possible devastating consequences.
Fighting is crucial in hockey because it makes the game itself safer. Hockey is a very physical sport with players ramming into each other trying to hit their opponents onto boards or hard ice, at extremely high speeds. Usually, big hits are targeted at the star players and there is not much an opposing team could do about it. “The code” in hockey is a set of unwritten rules that every hockey player follows. One of these rules is that you fight and protect your teammates at all costs. Therefore if your star player is hit, you make sure by any means necessary that it doesn’t happen again. Fighting is one way to ensure a player doesn’t hit your teammate again. This leads to players trying to avoid hitting a star player since they know that it will lead to them getting in a fight, possibly getting injured, and spending 5 minutes inside the penalty box. Without fighting, small star players such as Wayne Gretzky, never would’ve reached their level of greatness if fighting was not allowed. Despite the injuries that occur during fights, fighting is still safer than hitting. Throughout a full season, there are plenty more injuries that are a result of hitting compared to fighting. A few fights per season is definitely safer for the overall safety of players compared to thousands of big hits or “cheap shots”.
For the rare occasion I agree with what Don Cherry said about this debate, which is that most people who are against fights, have never played hockey and only watch hockey occasionally. That being said, these people do not understand the game of hockey and “the code”, and therefore cannot understand why fighting should still be part of the game.
Although I believe fighting should still be permitted, I strongly believe that the NHL should acknowledge the risks that go along with fighting, such as concussions that can develop into CTE. If the NHL would acknowledge this it would no longer be the league’s fault, leaving the players responsible for their actions.
In conclusion, I believe that fighting should continue to be permitted in hockey since it makes the game itself safer. However the NHL should acknowledge the risks of fighting, making players take responsibility for their actions.
Work Cited
Smart, Virginia, and Lisa Ellenwood. “Pain, Agony and ‘Years of Duress’: How Hockey Wives Are Fighting Back over Players’ Chronic Brain Injuries | CBC News.” CBCnews, CBC/Radio Canada, 24 Nov. 2019, www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hockey-players-enforcers-brain-injuries-1.5370444.